CIPEC - Center for the Study of Insitutions, Population, and Environmental Change
CIPEC Home > CIPEC Colloquium Series > Spring Semester 2000
 

Spring Semester 2000




Tuesday, January 18, 2000

Dawn Parker, Ph.D. Candidate, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, University of California, Davis. "Edge-Effect Externalities and Location Incentives: The Case of California Certified Organic Farmers."
Abstract

Many classic examples of externalities are inherently spatial and exhibit distance dependence -- impacts are severe at the border between conflicting land uses, but decline in severity as distance from the conflicting border increases. Examples include industrial smokestacks, factories whose water pollution impacts downstream users, and neighbor's cattle which damage crops in a farmer's field. While researchers analyzing these types of externalities have acknowledged the spatially heterogeneous aspect of damages in these cases, the location of both polluting and impacted land uses has been held fixed in this analysis.

I demonstrate that these "edge-effect externalities" create incentives which will influence the locations of impacted land users. The externality creates an explicit distancing incentive for the land users which can be viewed as an individually optimal buffer zone. Edge-effect externalities also have important ramifications for production possibilities in the land-use arrangement dimensions. Specifically, fragmentation of the economic landscape will lead to nonlinear declines in production possibilities. The natural question which follows from these two implications is whether market forces are likely to lead to patterns of land use which are economically efficient when edge-effect externalities are present. I demonstrate, both informally using a one-dimensional model and formally in the context of a two-dimensional, agent-based cellular automaton model, that a competitive market will not necessarily lead to efficient patterns of land use. The motivation for this failure is the existence of positive externalities between land users impacted by the edge-effect externalities.

These results motivate empirical analysis of locations and patterns of production of California Certified Organic Farmers, who are negatively impacted by potential spillovers from neighboring conventional farms, including pesticide drift, loss of beneficial insect populations, and potential contamination by genetically modified organisms. I motivate the use of landscape statistics to measure differences between organic and conventional farms which reflect economic responses to edge-effect externalities. In general, organic growers have an incentive to farm parcels which exhibit a lower proportion of borders on which buffers must be maintained than those farmed by conventional farmers. Preliminary evidence demonstrates that organic parcels are much less likely to share a border where a buffer would be required for certification than conventional parcels. Further, parcels are shown to differ according to other important geographic characteristics.

These landscape statistics will serve as explanatory variables in a limited dependent variable statistical model where the probability of finding a particular parcel in an organic as opposed to conventional use is modeled as a function of transport costs to market, soil type, relative prices, and the geographic characteristics of the parcel's local landscape. Information on soil type and transport costs, as well as local geography, will be derived using the geographic information system which I have developed for this research project. Results will shed light on the important determinants of location for organic farmers and will facilitate robust tests of the importance of local geography for firm location.

top of page


Tuesday, February 21, 2000

Marcos A. Pedlowski, Universidade Estadual do Norte Fluminense, Brazil. "Amazon and Mata Atlântica Rainforests: What Can We Learn from Past and Present to Avoid a Plain Bleak Future?"
Abstract

Contemporary deforestation of the Amazon and the Mata Atlântica rainforests, two of the most diverse ecosystems in the planet, began with the settlement of Brazil by Portuguese colonists in the sixteenth century. However, the Amazon and Mata Atlântica moist forests faced different degrees of deforestation rates along the last four centuries due to very different systems of land occupation. As a result, the Mata Atlântica lost about 90% of its original extent. The remaining Mata Atlântica is dispersed in a fragmented landscape and still facing high annual rates of deforestation. At the end of 1998 the estimated deforested area in the Amazon was around 10%. However, the second part of the 1990s was marked by extremely higher rates of deforestation throughout the Brazilian Amazon. In some areas of the Amazon (e.g., central Rondônia), landscape fragmentation is already reaching worrisome levels. This situation has raised serious concerns about the fate of Brazilian rainforests as many authors have included the Amazon and the Mata Atlântica in the list of deforestation hot spots in the tropics.

I have been involved in conducting extensive field surveys in the state of Rondônia located in western Brazilian Amazon since 1991. These surveys were centered on identifying land use practices adopted by small farmers and their impacts on the regional environment. Meanwhile, I have just begun surveying small farmers living on land reform settlements established by the Federal government in the northern part of Rio de Janeiro state. Despite the different ecological and historical settings, I have found striking similarities in the land use strategies and socioeconomic constraints affecting small farmers located in both of these areas. A key resemblance is the pervasive frontier mentality still present in farmers living in both the Mata Atlântica and the Amazon. This frontier mentality threatens the rainforests either as a locus for quick economic gain or as a barrier for economic development. In addition, governmental policies have reinforced this view over time with investments that benefit large ranchers but leave small farmers in a lose-lose situation. Moreover, areas selected for preservation in both regions are constantly under siege by squatters, cattle ranchers and saw mill owners. Meanwhile, the agents that hold the potential to improve the situation seem to also coincide in both areas. There is evidence that traditional populations, environmental NGOs and concerned scientists are beginning to establish meaningful partnerships in the two regions but comparative case studies are still rare. Therefore, based on my field experiences, I argue that there is a clear need of scientific studies that treat these two ecosystems as part of a single threatened biome. Finally, unless the existing potential for comparative studies is realized there will be no real possibility to improve the chances of stopping destructive land use systems and the chance of sustainable development in the these two rich biomes will be thin.

top of page


Monday, March 20, 2000

Melvin Ember, President, Human Relations Area Files (HRAF); Carol R.Ember, Executive Director, Human Relations Area Files (HRAF). "Resource Unpredictability and War: Cross-Cultural Results and Policy Implications."
Abstract

Results of various tests indicating how resource unpredictability predicts more frequent warfare in the ethnographic record, and how socialization for mistrust also predicts more war, but less strongly. Other results briefly discussed: how more participatory (more democratic) polities are unlikely to go to war with each other, and how warfare appears to favor socialization for aggression, which in turn seems inadvertently to produce higher rates of homicide and assault. Finally, discussion of policies suggested by the results that, if implemented internationally and perhaps even unilaterally, could make for a safer and more peaceful world in the future.

top of page


Tuesday, March 21, 2000

Dan Nepstad, Senior Scientist, Woods Hole Research Center & Instituto de Pesquisa Ambiental da Amazonia. "How to Set the Amazon on Fire."
Abstract

Fire is the greatest threat to the Amazon forest because of several vicious feedback loops. Fire promotes drought, and therefore more fire, by releasing smoke into the atmosphere, inhibiting rainfall. Burning also reduces rainfall by increasing albedo and decreasing water vapor flux to the atmosphere. Fire begets fire by escaping into forests, increasing their susceptibility to future burning. Escaped fires self-perpetuate by burning agricultural and forestry systems, discouraging landholders from making those fire-sensitive investments in their land that would allow them to move beyond their dependence upon fire as a management tool. These feedback's are discussed in light of a growing body of evidence from household interviews, field ecological studies, and regional modeling. Policy alternatives are presented, including a fundamental reformulation of the large-scale infrastructural investments planned for the region (Avança Brasil).

top of page


Monday, March 27, 2000

Dan Hogan, Population Studies Center - NEPO, State University of Campinas, Brazil. "Population Distribution, Conflicting Resource Demands and Quality of Life in Brazil."
Abstract:

The presentation will discuss the tensions inherent in the conflicting demands for environmental preservation, demographic and economic development and quality of life, in the context of a comparison of two river basins in the State of São Paulo. The Piracicaba-Capivari-Jundiaí Basin is a highly urbanized, densely populated region (approximately 4 million inhabitants in 56 municipalities in 1996) 100 km to the north of the São Paulo Metropolitan Area. Originally covered by the Atlantic Forest, it is now nearly completely deforested and suffers from most of the environmental ills associated with contemporary cities: air and water pollution, flooding of urban areas, inadequate disposition of solid waste, lack of green space, high levels of environmental and technological risks and, especially, inadequate water resources. On the other hand, its residents enjoy one of the highest levels of living in Brazil. Universities, research centers, medical facilities, high-tech industry and a sophisticated service economy are comparable to those of developed countries. The Ribeira Valley, 100 km to the South of the São Paulo Metropolitan Area, although roughly equal in size, has less than 10% of the PCJB population. Its forest has survived thanks to its lack of development - it is home to the most extensive remnants of the Atlantic Forest - and it is today the poorest region of the State, with the lowest education levels, highest fertility and mortality rates and an out-migration propelled by lack of job opportunities. To a considerable extent, this lack of opportunity stems from restrictions surrounding the creation of preservation areas, a major victory of the environmental movement in the eighties. This is a classic North-South confrontation, replayed within Brazil's richest state. According to a recent issue of Nature, the RV is one of the world's principle 25 biodiversity hot spots, but the priority given to preservation must be reconciled with the needs of its population. The PCJB has no hope of recovering its original forest, but must manage its water resources, plan its land use and correct past environmental aggressions. Both regions are problematic in terms of future demographic-economic development. One of the major reasons for this is that both regions are strongly affected by the resource (especially water) demands of the São Paulo Metropolitan Area. The PCJB lost 31m3/sec of its water in the seventies, when it was diverted to meet the needs of São Paulo; today, reduced supply combined with deterioration of water quality have created a critical situation. The RV is now seen as a potential solution to São Paulo's thirst, in spite of the region's preserved status. The issues of carrying capacity, sustainable development, population distribution and environmental quality may be clarified by the comparison of such contrasting, interconnected situations.

top of page


Thursday April 13, 2000

Pedro Jacobi, University of Texas & University of São Paulo, Brazil. "Brazilian Environmentalism in the 90'S: Social Representation and Articulations."
Abstract

Analysis of the process, its turning points since the 80's and the multiplication of social actors engaged in the promotion of strategies based on the premises of sustainable development. Reflection on an agenda that implies increasingly in more participatory practices involving governance of socio-environmental problems and the search of articulate and innovative institutional arrangements that enable the "environmentalization of social processes".

top of page



408 North Indiana Avenue, Bloomington, IN 47408-3799
Phone: (812) 855-2230
TDD: (812) 855-7654
Fax: (812) 855-2634

Last Updated: May 11, 2005
Comments: cipec@indiana.edu 
Copyright 2005, The Trustees of Indiana University.