CIPEC - Center for the Study of Insitutions, Population, and Environmental Change
CIPEC Home > CIPEC Colloquium Series > Fall Semester 2000
 

Fall Semester 2000

4:00-5:30 p.m. Monday, November 27, 2000
Jane Southworth, Post-Doctoral Fellow, SPEA/CIPEC, "Midwestern crop growth under conditions of climatic change - Implications and Adaptations for maize, soybeans, and wheat."
Abstract

Starting with the assumption of global climate change by 2050 this research concentrates on assessing how agriculture in the Upper Midwest of the US will adapt to climate change. In this study, climate data for current conditions (VEMAP data set) and for two future scenarios (HADCM2 model), in the form of monthly and daily values, were used to evaluate crop growth using DSSAT version 3.5, for 2050-59. These same climate data were then manipulated by changing their standard deviations to produce increased or decreased climate variability scenarios. Results were evaluated across 10 different locations, for maize, soybeans and wheat, and for seven climate scenarios (control or current conditions, mean changes, variance changes, mean and variance changes). Maize yields decreased across the southern study area and increased across northern areas. For wheat and soybeans yields generally increase across all states, with mean yield increases of >50% across northern states. Results are crop specific with major differences between C3 (soybean and wheat) and C4 (maize) crops. Soybeans and wheat yields show a mean CO2 fertilization effect >20%, with maize yields having only a limited effect (<5%). In addition, maize responds most negatively to high temperatures (>35 °C) producing a significant north-south divide across the study area relating to thermal gradients. Soybeans respond most negatively to the more extreme climate warming scenarios (HadCM2-GHG) but wheat responds most negatively to the doubled variability analyses. Year to year variability in yields increase significantly under doubled variability analyses with increased crop failures under these scenarios, with most failures under the HadCM2-GHG doubled variability analyses. Such results highlight the spatial variability, species variability, and alternative adaptation strategies. Economic implications of such changes at the farm level are also discussed.

top of page


4:00-5:30 p.m. Monday, November 20, 2000

Harini Nagendra, Post-Doctoral Fellow, CIPEC, "Incorporating landscape transformation into local conservation prioritization: A case study in the Western Ghats, India."
Abstract

In resource-rich and heterogeneous tropical areas such as cover large parts of India, patterns of ecosystem and landscape change are often locality-specific. Conservation strategies for such regions are best formulated at local scales. Consideration of species-based and ecosystem-based approaches along with an understanding of local landscape dynamics enables the design of more comprehensive strategies for assessing conservation priorities. This paper presents a method for conservation prioritization, which integrates information on ecosystem function and services with landscape dynamics.

The methodology is illustrated through a case study of a tropical, species-rich landscape in southern India, that is undergoing fairly rapid transformation. Vegetation types or ecosystems within the landscape are based on the ecosystem services they might provide: number of endemic species harbored, species richness, contribution to carbon uptake, economic value of produce per hectare and contribution to soil renewal. For a vegetation type, the weighted average of these ranks indicates its net conservation value. Weights thus provide a means of ascribing differential importance to an ecosystem service. Information on landscape change is also summarized by a matrix depicting the likelihood of transformations between vegetation types present in the landscape, projected five years into the future.

For each transformation between two vegetation types, information on ecosystem service and dynamics is then integrated. Implications from the perspective of conservation are assessed as the product of transformation probability and the resultant gain/loss in conservation value. Strongly positive transformations are likely to result in positive impacts on conservation value, and occur without any additional conservation effort. Strongly negative transformations are likely to occur and have a strong negative impact on conservation value. Maximum conservation effort may be directed at halting or reversing these.

Can this approach be adopted for CIPEC-IFRI linkages? A discussion of possibilities follows.

top of page


4:00-5:30 p.m. Monday, November 13, 2000

Gerald Nelson, Associate Professor Department of Agricultural and Consumer Economics, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign. "Spatial Econometric Analysis of Land Use in Developing Countries: An Example from the Darien, Panama."
Abstract

Human transformation of terrestrial ecosystems is central to global environmental change. The change process is driven by millions of individual decision-makers, many in developing countries, who determine the use of land under their control. The land use decision is fundamentally a local one but can be changed by public policy. It depends on location-specific natural resources such as climate and land quality, and location-specific socioeconomic variables such as prices and infrastructure availability. In developing countries, analysis of land use change is especially constrained by lack of data.

This presentation highlights new economic modeling approaches that involve spatial data. An empirical analysis of the consequences of infrastructure development (such as road construction) and policy changes (such as enhanced property rights) funded by a loan from the Interamerican Development Bank in Darien, Panama will be presented. The region has unique cultural and environmental endowments. The goal of the research was to predict land use changes that would occur after the road is resurfaced and other project interventions completed. We use the basic von Thunen insights on the role of location and transportation costs to develop a spatial econometric model of land use as a function of geophysical and socioeconomic variables and estimate it using spatial data for the province. The results of this model are used to predict spatially explicit effects of road resurfacing on economic activities. We use spatial analysis techniques to simulate how the project will affect land use at every location in the province.



Monday, October 30, 2000

Eduardo S. Brondizio, Department of Anthropology, Indiana University. "A Field-Image Data Base Strategy Using the LBA Project Example: Can we use it for CIPEC?"
Abstract

As part of the project "Human and physical dimensions of land use change in Amazonia: Secondary succession and Landscape structure" ACT, NIGEC, ISU (Indiana State University), and INPE (Brazilian National Institute for Space Research) have been working together for the past 2 years within the context of the Large Scale Biosphere-Atmosphere Experiment in Amazonia (LBA), a long-term program aiming to understand the interactions between human activities and the biophysical environment in Amazonia. Bringing together existing and new data from 7 research sites in the region was the first major challenge to address in order to allow us to examine our set of research questions. We concentrate on three main sets of questions: (1) modeling vegetation parameters and spectral data; (2) look at land use drivers across a range of representative human communities; (3) compare the impact of different land use systems on the structure and configuration landscapes. To address this challenge we developed a Oracle-based database that integrates vegetation inventories, land use history, and remote sensing data allowing extraction and modeling of vegetation-spectral data in a variety of ways. In parallel--but with a integrative concern, a database on economic species of secondary succession areas, and a database on property level socio-demographic and land use data have been developed. This presentation gives an introduction to the structure of these databases and the potential for use in other CIPEC research sites.

top of page


Monday, October 23, 2000

Joshua Epstein, Senior Fellow in Foreign Policy Studies, Brookings Institution, Washington D.C. "Modeling Civil Violence: An Agent-Based Computational Approach."
top of page


Monday, September 18, 2000
Dawn Parker, Post-Doctoral Fellow, CIPEC. "An Agent-Based Manifesto for Land Cover Modeling."
Abstract

"In my presentation, I will outline my research interests in three interlinked areas: environmental economics, complex social and  biological systems, and GIS based models of land cover change.  I will discuss the advantages of agent-based modeling as a tool which links these three research areas, drawing on my thesis research as an illustrative  example. My thesis research focused on a very specific problem in environmental economics -- negative spillovers between neighboring land users that exhibit distance dependence, with the magnitude of negative impacts decreasing as distance from the damaging land use increases.  The landscape impacts of these "edge-effect externalities", in parallel  with ecological edge effects, imply that different patterns of land use will produce different levels of total landscape productivity.  This phenomenon, mathematically titled a "nonconvexity", implies that a  variety of landscape patterns are possible in equilibrium, in contrast to most standard economic models.  Further, the spatial heterogeneity of edge-effect externalities implies a complex web of spatial interdependencies in the decisions of individual land owners.  These characteristics -- nonconvexities and interdependencies -- are key features of complex dynamic systems.  They also imply that a  traditional analytic model of this economic system would be intractable.

As an alternative to traditional economic modeling, I constructed an agent-based cellular automaton model of land owner decision making to analyze spatial patterns of economic activity under edge-effect externalities.  In these models, individually programmed "agents" make decisions based on a user specified internal decision calculus and information on their local environment.  This decentralized decision making environment facilitates models which reflect a much higher degree of heterogeneity and interdependencies than traditional analytical  models. Further, cellular automaton models produce explicit predictions related  to landscape pattern, facilitating testing of hypotheses related to  landscape pattern using real-world GIS data.  For my thesis, I used this general approach to motivate theoretical differences between organic and conventional farms and empirically demonstrate these differences  through analysis of GIS generated landscape statistics."

top of page


Monday, September 25, 2000

Darla Munroe, Post-Doctoral Fellow, CIPEC. "The Use of Econometric and Spatial Econometric Techniques in Modeling Land Use/Land Cover Change."
Abstract

"There exists a small but growing literature for modeling land use/land cover changes using econometric techniques. Any model that attempts to explain land use changes must not only consider socioeconomic variations over time, but incorporate relevant geophysical, infrastructural and policy variation as well. In addition, spatial relationships, both absolute and relative, cannot be ignored. This talk will include a survey of a few econometric models of land use change, both spatially explicit and non-spatial in nature. Then, a methodology for econometric models of land use change in Indiana will be introduced. Because of the highly complex nature of variations over space and time, one model cannot possibly explain all observed changes in land use. Nevertheless, such attempts provide an important starting point for identifying and quantifying the relationships among the above variables and land use change in Indiana. "

top of page


408 North Indiana Avenue, Bloomington, IN 47408-3799
Phone: (812) 855-2230
TDD: (812) 855-7654
Fax: (812) 855-2634

Last Updated: May 11, 2005
Comments: cipec@indiana.edu 
Copyright 2005, The Trustees of Indiana University.